Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 18 de 18
Filter
1.
Lab Med ; 53(5): e126-e128, 2022 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20244410

ABSTRACT

The physiology of hemostasis is one of high complexity that involves the initiation, amplification, and propagation of the many moving parts of the hemostatic system and its regulatory mechanisms. It is imperative that clinical laboratory professionals have a strong understanding of the many intricacies of the physiology of coagulation and its in vitro testing. An elongated activated partial thromboplastin time can have several causes, and the correct cause must be elucidated in a timely manner for proper treatment. A mixing study with normal pooled plasma should be performed to evaluate for the presence of an inhibitor vs factor deficiency. Factor inhibitors, specifically factor VIII in this case study, should be titered so that the clinician can decide which treatment may work best for the patient. Continued monitoring of factor levels and inhibitor titers should be conducted to follow the resolution or progression of inhibitor presence.


Subject(s)
Factor VIII , Hemophilia A , Blood Coagulation , Blood Coagulation Tests , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , Partial Thromboplastin Time
3.
J Med Case Rep ; 17(1): 125, 2023 Mar 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2258231

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the literature, reported cases of Acquired hemophilia A (AHA) induced by COVID-19 vaccination occurred after Adenoviral Vector Deoxyribonucleic Acid (DNA)- and SARS-CoV-2 Messenger Ribonucleic acid (mRNA)-Based vaccines. Here, and to the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of AHA occurring after an inactivated Sinovac-coronavac COVID-19 vaccine. CASE PRESENTATION: A 69-year-old Tunisian male patient consulted for severe left leg pain limiting physical mobility due to a 5*6 cm large ecchymosis located at the left inner thigh, having spontaneously appeared 5 days prior consultation and without notion of trauma. The patient had no known personal medical history. He had received the second dose of CoronaVac-SinoVac vaccine 30 days prior to consultation. Further physical examination revealed the presence of two other ecchymoses: one at the inner face of the right forearm, starting at the wrist reaching the elbow and the other at the left flank of the abdomen. Diagnosis of AHA was based on clinical presentation and confirmed with prolonged a PTT, Factor VIII deficiency and the presence of an FVIII inhibitor. The patient was successfully treated with corticosteroids and low dose Rituximab. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should consider AHA in front of prolonged aPTT with or without spontaneous bleedings even after inactivated virus COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Humans , Male , Aged , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2
4.
Expert Rev Hematol ; 15(10): 933-942, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2271452

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia A is a genetically conditioned disease leading to hemostatic disorders due to factor VIII (FVIII) deficiency. The treatment of hemophilia has evolved throughout the past years and has significantly changed. One of the newest drugs for prophylactic treatment is the humanized bispecific IgG antibody - emicizumab, which binds with factor IXa and factor X, bridging those factors and thus mimicking the activity of factor VIII. AREAS COVERED: The literature search was done via the PubMed database, with the emphasis on clinical trials and case reports, describing the off-label emicizumab use. This review presents an extensive summary and considers the advantages and disadvantages (side-effects) of emicizumab, describing additional clinical situations, where emicizumab has been successfully used. In our review, we cover information about the mechanisms of action, indications, and efficacy and discuss some chosen case reports about off-label emicizumab use. EXPERT OPINION: Its convenient administration method (subcutaneous) and frequency of injections (from once a week to once a month) makes it a more comfortable treatment, limiting injection-site reactions, hospital stays, costs of prophylaxis, and significantly increasing patients' quality of life. Adverse effects are scarce and rarely serious - the most common ones are reactions at the injection-site and upper respiratory tract infections.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Hemophilia A , Humans , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/prevention & control , Hemophilia A/complications , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Factor X/therapeutic use , Quality of Life , Factor IXa/therapeutic use , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Hemorrhage/etiology , Antibodies, Bispecific/adverse effects , Immunoglobulin G/therapeutic use
7.
Biochem Med (Zagreb) ; 32(3): 030801, 2022 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2080940

ABSTRACT

The acquired hemophilia A (AHA) is a life-threatening condition. The incidence of AHA is extremely low, which requires a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and treatment. This is case report of 73-year-old man who presented with AHA secondary to severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia. The patient had extensive skin bleeding and hematomas. In the coagulation screening tests activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was prolonged with normal prothrombin time (PT), which was indication for further investigation. The APTT in a mixing study with normal plasma did not correct so clotting factors inhibitors were suspected. With signs of bleeding, extremely low factor VIII (FVIII) activity (2%) and presence of FVIII inhibitors, AHA was diagnosed and treatment initiated. Patient was treated with factor eight inhibitor bypassing agent (FEIBA) for three days, followed by long-term corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide therapy. Malignant and autoimmune diseases as the most common causes of AHA were ruled out. The patient had a good response to therapy with gradual normalization of APTT and FVIII activity. To the best of our knowledge, the present case is the first reported case of de novo AHA after SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. The diagnosis of AHA should be suspected in a patient with bleeding into the skin and mucous membranes without a previous personal and family history of bleeding, and with isolated prolonged APTT. It is important to investigate any isolated prolongation of APTT in cooperation with clinical laboratory experts.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Pneumonia , Aged , COVID-19/complications , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
8.
Indian J Med Res ; 155(5&6): 472-477, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2040109

ABSTRACT

Background & objectives: Haemophilia is a debilitating bleeding disorder with significant comorbidities affecting the quality of life. In India, the management of these individuals is still limited to on-demand institutional treatment with coagulant factors. In this study, we highlighted the problems faced by these patients in the COVID-19 period due to nationwide lockdown. Methods: A retrospective study was done to ascertain the trend in the number of patients with haemophilia A and B visiting the hospital, those succumbing to haemophilic complications and indications for factor requirement in the pre-COVID (October 2019-March 2020) and during the COVID-19 period (April-September 2020). Representative cases with unusual complications were described along with significant challenges faced in providing standard care of treatment to these individuals due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: A total of 818 and 162 individuals with haemophilia A and B, respectively, were registered with the department. The overall number of patient visits to the hospital significantly reduced from an average of 6.9 outpatient department (OPD) visits per patient in the pre-COVID-19 period to an average of 3.9 OPD visits per patient and admissions reduced to 50 per cent during the COVID-19 period. This led to a reduction in utilization of factors VIII and IX except VIIa for haemophilia with inhibitors. There was no factor utilization for elective surgeries during the COVID-19 period. A total of eight patients succumbed to haemophilia-related complications during the COVID-19 period due to delay in reaching the hospital. The challenges faced in the management of three cases with musculoskeletal bleeds, one case with scrotal haematoma and one with haemothorax during the COVID-19 period were also highlighted. Interpretation & conclusions: COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled the need for on-demand home treatment with coagulant factors and has also brought to light the existing need for primary prophylaxis, especially for younger individuals with haemophilia.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Humans , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/epidemiology , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control
9.
Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis ; 33(6): 342-347, 2022 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2001485

ABSTRACT

Immunosuppressive treatment and bypassing agents are used to treat acquired haemophilia A (AHA). On the other hand, COVID-19 infection induces a hypercoagulable state. Managing bleeding, risk of thrombosis, bypassing agents, active infection and immunosuppressive treatment can be challenging. A 72-year-old man was diagnosed with acquired hemophilia A. He received steroids, rituximab and recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa). He developed severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. Due to thrombotic risk, he received low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) and developed an iliopsoas hematoma. Because of the risk of thrombosis, treatment with recombinant porcine FVIII (rpFVIII) was requested. Tocilizumab was administered for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection and unexpected improvement of FVIII levels was noted. Concluding, rpFVIII treatment was well tolerated and effective, easy to monitor and to administer. Tocilizumab may play a role as immunosuppressive treatment for AHA. The role of LMWH remains to be established in patients with coagulopathies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Pneumonia , Animals , COVID-19/complications , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Pneumonia/complications , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , SARS-CoV-2 , Swine
10.
Haemophilia ; 28(5): 687-693, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1846209

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend that patients with haemophilia should preferably receive vaccination subcutaneously. COVID-19 and other vaccines, however, are only licenced for intramuscular application. AIMS: To assess the safety of intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination in patients living with haemophilia. METHODS: Part A of this prospective observational study enrolled consecutive patients with haemophilia A (HA) and B (HB) of all ages and severities and assessed injection site bleeding and other complications within 30 days of vaccination. Part B enrolled patients providing informed consent for detailed data collection including medication and prophylaxis around the time of vaccination. Logistic regression was performed to assess potential risk factors for bleeding. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-one patients were enrolled into part A. The primary endpoint injection site bleeding occurred in seven patients (1.5%, 95% confidence interval .7-3.1%). Comprehensive analysis of 214 patients (404 vaccinations, part B) revealed that 97% of patients with severe haemophilia had prophylaxis before vaccination, either as part of their routine prophylaxis or using additional doses. 56% and 30% of patients with moderate and mild haemophilia, respectively, received prophylaxis before vaccination. Among the seven bleeds recorded, three occurred when intramuscular vaccination was done without prophylaxis (odds ratio 12). CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study reporting on the safety of intramuscular vaccination in haemophilia. The rate of injection site bleeding was low in mild haemophilia, and in moderate and severe haemophilia if patients received factor prophylaxis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Humans , Prospective Studies , Vaccination/adverse effects
12.
Front Immunol ; 13: 868133, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1817945

ABSTRACT

While the global pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is still ongoing and new virus variants are emerging, there is a universal need for vaccines to protect individuals from severe complications and ideally control the pandemic by enabling herd immunity. Several vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been approved and are widely used to stem the recurring waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Post-marketing surveillance is essential to record even rare safety issues related to these new vaccines. Among these issues, several autoimmune phenomena have been recorded in temporal association with and feasibly triggered by a vaccination. Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare condition characterized by new-onset haemorrhagic diathesis caused by an inhibitor of blood clotting factor VIII (FVIII), often in the elderly and most commonly associated with autoimmune or malignant disease. There have been a small number of AHA cases triggered by vaccinations, including those against SARS-CoV-2. We report the first case of AHA in temporal association with an mRNA-1273 booster vaccination. The diagnosis was made promptly, and the patient received appropriate care including immunosuppression using glucocorticoids, cyclophosphamide (CYC) and rituximab (RTX). The haemorrhage ceased after escalation of treatment, and the patient is recovering. Concurrent malignancy was initially ruled out using a wide scope of diagnostic tests, but pleomorphic dermal sarcoma (PDS) of the forehead occurred after initiation of specific AHA immunosuppressive treatment. Since large vaccination programs are ongoing worldwide and potential adverse events during post-marketing surveillance have been reported following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2, this case illustrates challenges in rare events occurring in association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and to proof a causal relationship. Therefore, there is an urgent need for reporting any events in association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, but also a crucial discussion about possible concurrent triggers and follow-up information about individual patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Sarcoma , Viral Vaccines , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination/adverse effects
13.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(3)2022 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1736044

ABSTRACT

Acquired haemophilia A (AHA) is a rare bleeding disorder with high morbidity and mortality, but it is eminently treatable if diagnosis and treatment are prompt. We report a case of AHA in Southeast Asia following the administration of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. A man in his 80s developed multiple bruises 2 weeks after his first dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. Diagnosis was delayed due to his cognitive impairment and low clinical suspicion. This led to a representation with worsening ecchymosis, a left thigh haematoma and symptomatic anaemia. Laboratory testing was notable for an isolated prolongation of the activated partial thromboplastin time, which remained uncorrected in the mixing test. Further testing confirmed the presence of factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors and low FVIII titres of 6.7%. He responded to treatment with intravenous methylprednisolone and recombinant activated FVII. Screening for autoimmune diseases and malignancies was negative.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Asia, Southeastern , BNT162 Vaccine , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Hemophilia A/etiology , Humans , Male , SARS-CoV-2
15.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(10)2021 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1447986

ABSTRACT

An 80-year-old man with no personal or family history of bleeding, presented to hospital with extensive haematomas and skin bruising after using doxycycline. His basic lab workup was concerning for a coagulopathy with an elevated activated partial thromboplastin time and significant anaemia. Mixing studies and other factor levels were tested that led to the diagnosis of acquired haemophilia A with low factor VIII levels and high factor VIII antibodies. He was started on steroids, but his haemoglobin level continued to drop. Later, during his treatment, he was given multiple therapeutic agents, including cyclophosphamide, rituximab and recombinant factor VII (NovoSeven-R). Gradually factor VIII levels increased and haemoglobin stabilised. The hospital course was complicated by COVID-19 pneumonia leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome; the patient eventually expired due to respiratory failure.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hemophilia A , Aged, 80 and over , Doxycycline/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/chemically induced , Hemophilia A/diagnosis , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Partial Thromboplastin Time , SARS-CoV-2
16.
Haemophilia ; 27(5): 736-743, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1288288

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emicizumab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously, mimicking the action of activated coagulation factor VIII, has been approved in Europe for use in patients with severe hemophilia of all ages. AIMS: To assess availability, acceptance, adverse events, efficacy and laboratory monitoring of emicizumab and the effect of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on its use. METHODS: Online questionnaire sent to 144 hemophilia treatment centres (November 2020 to January 2021). RESULTS: Forty-six physicians from 21 countries responded, with a total of 3420 patients with severe HA under their care. Emicizumab was widely available, for 100% of inhibitor patients and 88% of non-inhibitor patients. No major adverse events were reported. Four reported deaths in patients on emicizumab were not thought to be related to emicizumab. An annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of zero was achieved in 73% of inhibitors patients. Haemostasis was satisfactory in the majority of minor (93.7%) and major (90.7%) surgical procedures performed while on emicizumab. Inhibitor titers were monitored in 78.4% of inhibitor patients on emicizumab, but chromogenic FVIII assay was only available in 73% of centres. The COVID-19 pandemic did not have a major impact on the adoption of emicizumab in most centres (64.9%). CONCLUSION: Three years after its rollout in Europe, emicizumab is widely available. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated to be very good, keeping in mind the inherent limitations of the study. Unmet needs include establishment of treatment guidelines for surgery and breakthrough bleeding, limited expertise, especially in young children, and availability of laboratory assays.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Hemophilia A , Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19 , Europe , Factor VIII , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Humans , Pandemics , Surveys and Questionnaires
17.
Acta Haematol ; 144(3): 319-321, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-802601

ABSTRACT

A 54-year-old man with a long history of severe haemophilia A treated prophylactically with efmoroctocog alpha (3,000 IU twice weekly) was diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. He had multiple risk factors for COVID-19 severity including obesity, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. He required prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay due to the severity of respiratory failure until his death on day 24. During his ICU stay, he received a continuous infusion of efmoroctocog alpha in order to maintain factor VIII activity between 80 and 100%, together with therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin targeting anti-Xa activity above 0.5 IU/mol. He tolerated numerous invasive procedures without bleeding. At post-mortem examination, there was no evidence for thrombosis or haemorrhage in the different organs.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Factor VIII/therapeutic use , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments/therapeutic use , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation Tests , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/virology , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/pathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index
18.
J Thromb Haemost ; 18(9): 2202-2204, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-593310

ABSTRACT

COVID-19 can be associated with coagulopathy (CAC, COVID-19-associated coagulopathy) with a high prothrombotic risk based on an intense inflammatory response to viral infection leading to immunothrombosis through different procoagulant pathways. Emerging evidence suggests that the use of heparin in these patients could be associated with lower mortality. Emicizumab is a bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody that bridges activated factor IX and factor X, thereby restoring the function of missing factor VIIIa in hemophilia A. The use of emicizumab has been associated with thrombotic events in patients who also received high cumulative amounts of activated prothrombin complex concentrates. Although this risk is extremely low, there is a lack of evidence on whether CAC increases the thrombotic risk in patients on emicizumab prophylaxis. We present the case of a patient with severe hemophilia A in prophylaxis treatment with emicizumab; due to the potential thrombotic risk we decided to administer low molecular weight heparin as prophylaxis treatment without any thrombotic or bleeding complications.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bispecific/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Hemophilia A/complications , Hemophilia A/drug therapy , Venous Thromboembolism/prevention & control , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Blood Coagulation , Coagulants , Factor IXa/chemistry , Factor X/chemistry , Follow-Up Studies , HIV Infections/complications , Hepatitis C/complications , Humans , Inflammation , Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin/complications , Male , Middle Aged , Thrombosis , Venous Thromboembolism/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL